|
| |
|
Home
» Election Information & Other Links
» 2006 General Election Results |
Print |
|
|
|
 |
| |
2006 HUGHES COUNTY
GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS
TOTAL BALLOTS CAST - 8245
For United States Representative
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Bruce W. Whalen Republican Party - 2364
Stephanie Herseth Democratic Party - 5617
Larry Rudebusch Libertarian Party - 88
For Governor and Lieutenant Governor
To Be Elected As A Team you may vote for one or leave it blank
Mike Rounds for Governor and
Dennis Daugaard for Lieutenant Governor - 5675
Republican Party
Steven J. Willis for Governor and
Larry Johnsen for Lieutenant Governor - 78
Constitution Party
Jack Billion for Governor and
Eric Abrahamson for Lieutenant Governor - 2325
Democratic Party
Tom Gerber for Governor and
Bette Rose Ryan for Lieutenant Governor - 55
Libertarian Party
For Secretary of State
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Chris Nelson Republican Party - 6417
For Attorney General
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Larry Long Republican Party - 6393
Ron Volesky Democratic Party - 1419
Randy Ristesund Libertarian Party - 151
For State Auditor
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Rich Sattgast Republican Party - 5920
For State Treasurer
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Vernon L. Larson Republican Party - 6139
For Commissioner of School and Public Lands
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Jarrod Johnson Republican Party - 3845
Bryce Healy Democratic Party - 3922
Jade Ager Libertarian Party - 84
For Public Utilities Commissioner
you may vote for one or leave it blank
John Koskan Republican Party - 4311
Steve Kolbeck Democratic Party - 3091
Ben Sutter Libertarian Party - 193
For State Senator District 24
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Bob Gray Republican Party - 5789
For State Representative District 24
you may vote for up to two or leave it blank
Ryan P. Olson Republican Party - 5092
Tim G. Rounds Republican Party - 4761
NONPOLITICAL BALLOT
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE RETENTION BALLOT
Shall the justices of the Supreme Court named on this ballot, whose terms expire January 1, 2007, be retained in office?
VOTE ON EACH JUSTICE
Justice John K. Konenkamp representing the First Supreme Court District
YES - 6097
NO - 797
Justice Richard W. Sabers representing the Second Supreme Court District
YES - 5957
NO - 889
Justice Steven L. Zinter representing the Third Supreme Court District
YES - 6701
NO - 695
Justice Judith K. Meierhenry representing the Fourth Supreme Court District
YES - 6087
NO - 1034
Justice David Gilbertson representing the Fifth Supreme Court District
YES - 6275
NO - 706
FOR JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
SIXTH CIRCUIT, POSITION A
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Max A. Gors - 5861
SIXTH CIRCUIT, POSITION B
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Lori S. Wilbur - 6102
Anita L. Fuoss - 1361
SIXTH CIRCUIT, POSITION C
you may vote for one or leave it blank
James W. Anderson - 5330
SIXTH CIRCUIT, POSITION D
you may vote for one or leave it blank
Rose Ann Wendell - 2966
Kathleen Felker Trandahl - 4250
Constitutional Amendments
The following amendments to the State Constitution are submitted to the voters by the Legislature or by petition. The amendments will not become effective unless approved by majority vote.
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT C
Title: An Amendment to Article XXI of the South Dakota Constitution, relating to marriage.
Attorney General Explanation: South Dakota statutes currently limit marriage to unions between a man and a woman. However, the State Constitution does not address marriage. Amendment C would amend the State Constitution to allow and recognize marriage only between a man and a woman. It would also prohibit the Legislature from allowing or recognizing civil unions, domestic partnerships or other quasi-marital relationships between two or more persons regardless of sex.
Yes A vote "Yes" will change the Constitution. - 4055
No A vote "No" will leave the Constitution as it is. - 4097
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT D
Title: An Amendment to Article XI, Section 2 of the South Dakota Constitution, relating to real property assessment for taxation.
Attorney General Explanation: The State Constitution currently requires that all taxable property be valued for tax purposes at no more than its actual value, and that all property be classified and taxed uniformly. The proposed amendment to the State Constitution would base the taxable value of property upon "acquisition value" for property sold after January 1, 2007. The Legislature may authorize the assessed value of such property to be annually adjusted by up to three percent, using the 2003 assessed property valuation as the base year. The taxable value of the property may be further adjusted if the property has changed use or classification or has been subject to addition, improvement or destruction. The limitations of this amendment will not apply to centrally assessed property or to any property sold prior to January 1, 2007.
Yes A vote "Yes" will change the Constitution. - 960
No A vote "No" will leave the Constitution as it is. - 7084
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT E
Title: An Amendment to Article VI of the South Dakota Constitution, relating to judicial decisions.
Attorney General Explanation: Citizens serving on juries, school boards, city councils, county commissions, or in similar capacities, and prosecutors and judges, are all required to make judicial decisions. Their decisions may be reversed on appeal, or they may be removed from office for misconduct or by election. However, they cannot be made to pay money damages for making such decisions. This allows them to do their job without fear of threat or reprisal from either side. The proposed amendment to the State Constitution would allow thirteen special grand jurors to expose these decision makers to fines and jail, and strip them of public insurance coverage and up to one-half of their retirement benefits, for making decisions which break rules defined by the special grand jurors. Special grand jurors are drawn from those who submit their names and registered voters. The proposed amendment is retroactive. The special grand jurors may penalize any decision-maker still alive for decisions made many years ago. If approved, the proposed amendment will likely be challenged in court and may be declared to be in violation of the US Constitution. If so, the State may be required to pay attorneys fees and costs.
Yes A vote "Yes" will change the Constitution. - 740
No A vote "No" will leave the Constitution as it is. - 7379
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT F
Title: An Amendment to Article III of the South Dakota Constitution, relating to the Legislature.
Attorney General Explanation: This proposed amendment to the State Constitution includes recommendations by the Constitution Revision Commission. The amendment would remove the current limitation on expense reimbursements received by legislators, and would allow legislators to receive salary, per diem, expenses and mileage reimbursement as provided by law. The amendment would remove the current specific prohibitions against enacting private or special laws. The Legislature would be restrictedby a general prohibition against enacting aspecial law when a general or local law can be made applicable. The amendment would remove the Congressional term limit, which the federal courts have found unconstitutional. The procedure for introduction of a bill would be shortened. The amendment would require a two-thirds vote to close a legislative session to the public and prohibit any vote to be taken in a closed session. The amendment would allow the Legislature to exercise emergency powers in the event of man-made and natural disasters.
Yes A vote "Yes" will change the Constitution. - 2593
No A vote "No" will leave the Constitution as it is. - 5367
Initiated Measures
The following initiated measures were proposed by petition for submission to the voters. These initiated measures will not become effective unless approved by majority vote.
INITIATED MEASURE 2
Title: An Initiative to increase the tax on cigarettes and tobacco products and to dedicate the revenues.
Attorney General Explanation: South Dakota currently taxes tobacco products. The proposed law would increase taxation on tobacco products sold in the state. The tax on a 20 stick cigarette package would be raised by $1.00; the tax on a 25 stick cigarette package would be raised by $1.25. The tax on all other tobacco products such as cigars, roll-your-own, and chewing tobacco, would increase from 10 percent to 35 percent of the wholesale price. The proposed law would deposit up to $30 million of tobacco tax revenue into the state general fund. The next $5 million, if any, will be deposited in the tobacco prevention and reduction trust fund. Tobacco tax revenue in excess of $35 million, if any, will be divided among the property tax reduction fund, the education enhancement trust fund, and the health care trust fund. The proposed law also establishes continuous appropriations out of the tobacco prevention and reduction trust fund for specified purposes.
Yes A vote "Yes" will adopt the proposed law. - 4735
No A vote "No" will reject the proposed law. - 3427
INITIATED MEASURE 3
Title: An Initiative to prohibit starting a school term prior to the last day of August.
Attorney General Explanation: State law currently allows local school boards to establish the start of a regular school term on any date. The proposed law would prohibit local school boards from establishing the start of a regular school term prior to the last day of August.
Yes A vote "Yes" will adopt the proposed law. - 2787
No A vote "No" will reject the proposed law. - 5260
INITIATED MEASURE 4
Title: An act to provide safe access to medical marijuana for certain qualified persons.
Attorney General Explanation: This initiative would allow persons, including minors with parental consent, with a debilitating medical condition, to be certified to grow (not more than six plants), possess (not more than one ounce) and use small amounts of marijuana for medical purposes. "Debilitating medical condition" is defined to include cancer, glaucoma, HIV, AIDS, or a chronic, debilitating condition that produces cachexia, wasting syndrome, severe or chronic pain, severe nausea, seizures, including epileptic seizures, severe or persistent muscle spasms, including spasms caused by spinal injury, multiple sclerosis, Crohn's disease or fibromyalgia or any other medical condition approved by the Department of Health. Certification may be accomplished by submitting medical records to the Department of Health or by submitting a doctor's recommendation. A person may not drive while impaired by marijuana and may not smoke marijuana in any place where tobacco smoking is prohibited. Growth, possession and use of marijuana will still be illegal under federal law but certification is a defense to criminal prosecution under state law.
Yes A vote "Yes" will adopt the proposed law. - 3625
No A vote "No" will reject the proposed law. - 4484
INITIATED MEASURE 5
Title: An Initiative to place certain restrictions on the use of state owned or leased aircraft.
Attorney General Explanation: State law currently allows state employees to use vehicles owned or leased by the State only for state business. There is a limited exception for state employees with a supervisor's approval. The Governor and certain law enforcement personnel are exempt. The proposed law requires aircraft owned or leased by the State to be used only for state business, with no exceptions. A person violating this provision would now be subject to civil and criminal penalties.
Yes A vote "Yes" will adopt the proposed law. - 3299
No A vote "No" will reject the proposed law. - 4735
INITIATED MEASURE 7
Title: An Initiative to repeal video lottery.
Attorney General Explanation: The State operates video lottery as authorized by State law. During the last year, the State received approximately one hundred twelve million dollars($112,000,000.00) from video lottery which is 11% of the state general fund budget. The proposed law would repeal video lottery and eliminate this source of revenue.
Yes A vote "Yes" will adopt the proposed law. - 2238
No A vote "No" will reject the proposed law. - 5847
INITIATED MEASURE 8
Title: An Act to repeal the gross receipts tax on wireless telecommunication services.
Attorney General Explanation: State laws impose a four percent tax on the gross receipts of companies providing wireless telecommunications (cell phone) services instead of a property tax. Last year the State received approximately eight and one-half million dollars ($8,500,000.00) from the cell phone tax. Forty percent (40%) of these revenues are distributed to counties based on population; the balance goes to the State. The proposed law would repeal this tax, and eliminate this source of revenue.
Yes A vote "Yes" will adopt the proposed law. - 2901
No A vote "No" will reject the proposed law. - 5172
REFERRED LAW
The following law was adopted by the Legislature and referred to the voters by petition. This law will not become effective unless approved by majority vote.
REFERRED LAW 6
Title: Referral of HB 1215, entitled "An Act to establish certain legislative findings, to reinstate the prohibition against certain acts causing the termination of an unborn human life, to prescribe a penalty therefore, and to provide for the implementation of such provisions under certain circumstances."
Attorney General Explanation: Current South Dakota law generally allows a pregnant woman to obtain an abortion during the first 24 weeks of pregnancy. Beyond 24 weeks, abortions may be performed only if necessary to preserve the life or health of the pregnant woman. House Bill 1215 would prohibit any person, at any time, from providing any medicine or other substance to a pregnant woman for the specific purpose of terminating her pregnancy. However, a person may provide a contraception substance to a woman without penalty prior to the time her pregnancy could be determined by conventional medical testing. HB 1215 would also prohibit any person, at any time, from using any instrument or procedure on a pregnant woman for the specific purpose of terminating her pregnancy, unless the person is a licensed physician performing a medical procedure to prevent the death of the pregnant woman. Any person other than the pregnant woman who violates the provisions of HB 1215 would commit a felony. If approved, HB 1215 will likely be challenged in court and may be declared to be in violation of the US Constitution. If so, the State may be required to pay attorneys fees and costs.
Yes A vote "Yes" will allow the Act to become effective. - 3012
No A vote "No" will reject the Act. - 5124
|
|
 |
|
|